Friday, October 12, 2007

The Abuse of Rhode Island's Protection From Abuse Laws

By Christopher Pearsall Platinum Quality Author



We hear about domestic abuse frequently. It's on television, billboards, radio, flyers and posters. Unfortunately what we don't hear about is how Rhode Island's Protection from Abuse laws are themselves being abused by people who want to wreak vengeance on another person for any number of reasons.


For those that are unfamiliar with the process, it is relatively straightforward. You fill out a triplicate form indicating your relationship to the person against whom the "protection from abuse order" is sought, the date the threats of imminent violence or the events that cause you to believe that you and/or your children are in danger of physical harm, and the relief you are seeking from the court. A second triplicate form is supposed to tell your story. What was it that led you to file for this Protection from Abuse Order? What was said? What was done? What do you have personal knowledge about regarding this person that justifies the relief you are requesting. You sign this as a sworn statement under oath.


What happens next? You go before the court and a Rhode Island Family Court Judge reads your application for a Protection from Abuse Order and your affidavit. If the court finds any reasonable basis upon which to believe that the Order should be issued for the protection of the party applying to the court, the court will grant it. This is all based upon the applicant's affidavit.


So what is the relief? Consistently it is a "no contact order" that the person against whom it is sought may not contact the applicant in any way. More often than not, it also includes ordering the person against whom it is sought that he or she must remain out of the living residence of the applicant.


If the parties have minor children together the Order may give exclusive custody of those minor children to the applicant which although not specifically denying the other parent visitation has that practical effect.


Unfortunately the system gets abused weekly without consequences. Persons come before the court and fabricate circumstances that never existed, distort the truth and make glaring omissions. If the court knew the true facts and circumstances the vast majority of these abuses would be curtailed.


My stomach turns each time I am privy to persons who lie to the court with impunity because the law does not provide for a punishment for those who abuse Rhode Island's Protection from Abuse Laws.


It says much about people who boldly go before the court and lie to achieve their own silent agendas. Fathers are cast from their homes and unable to see their children because the mother of their children feels scorned. Women who obtain these Orders call the very person they do not want contact with in order to provoke a response, have the man arrested and then use the criminal charge either as further leverage in a divorce or as some sense of sick vindication that makes them feel better.


Perhaps this all comes down simply to one's sense of honor or personal morality. Yet for the man (I refer to men because I estimate that at least 9 of 10 applicants are women against men) who is forced from his home, unable to see his children, possibly subjected to criminal charges, may lose his job and/or the respect of friends and colleagues . . . it is an exercise in injustice and a very sobering experience that such a thing could even be allowed by the court.


So where does this abuse lie? The abuse finds it's home in the audacity of those who without conscience lie under oath to the court for their own purposes with little worry of prosecution, retribution, or even penalty.


So what is the remedy for a man subject to all these damaging consequences, including prosecution, etc... if it is proven that the women's claims in the initial affidavit were false? Dismissal of the family court's initial order but NOT any criminal violation that may have occurred on the Protection from Abuse Order that never should have issued. The consolation for such a man who has not done the things he was accused of is no consolation at all. . . simply the realization that injustice exists and the impression that upon a person swearing before a Notary Public to lies in their affidavit the court appears to rubber stamp that injustice to the detriment of good people.








Visit http://www.ChristopherPearsall.com to learn about Attorney Pearsall's Divorce focused practice Visit Pearsall Law Associates for a different look at Attorney Pearsall's practice PLUS . . . get detailed Rhode island Divorce Information at Rhode Island Divorce Tips Blog


Contact Attorney Pearsall at (401) 354-2369 for your low-cost consultation and even find out why FREE consultations are worth exactly what you pay for them!


This article is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. You should not take legal action without legal advice from a licensed practitioner who has been fully informed about your specific circumstances. The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all attorneys in the general practice of law and has no procedure for recognition of specialties.


No comments: